Thursday, October 25, 2012



At his first inauguration, George Washington took the oath of office for the presidency on April 30, 1789. He was standing on the balcony of Federal Hall in New York City with his hand on an open Bible. After he finished taking the oath, the audience in attendance gave a thunderous ovation and bells of the various churches began ringing in his honor. After his oath of office was completed, he went to deliver his inaugural address to Congress.

April 30, 1789

Such being the impressions under which I have, in obedience to the public summons, repaired to the present station, it would be peculiarly improper to omit, in this first official act, my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules over the universe, who presides in the councils of nations and whose providential aide can supply every human defect, that His benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the United States a Government instituted by themselves for these essential purposes; and may enable every instrument employed in its administration to execute with success, the functions allotted to his charge.
In tendering this homage to the Great Author of every public and private good, I assure myself that it expresses your sentiments not less than my own; nor those of my fellow-citizens at large, less than either. No people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the Invisible Hand which conducts the affairs of men more than the people of the United States.
Every step by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency; and in the important revolution just accomplished in the system of their United government, the tranquil deliberations and voluntary consent of so many distinct communities, from which the event has resulted can not be compared with the means by which most governments have been established, without some return of pious gratitude, along with an humble anticipation of the future blessings which them past seem to presage.
These reflections, arising out of the present crisis, have forced themselves too strongly on my mind to be suppressed. You will join with me I trust in thinking, that there are none under the influence of which the proceedings of a new and free Government can more auspiciously commence.
We ought to be no less persuaded that the propitious smiles of Heaven can never be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right which Heaven itself has ordained; and since the preservation of sacred fire of liberty and the destiny of the republican model of government are justly considered as deeply, perhaps finally, staked of the experiment...
I shall take my present leave; but not without resorting once more to the Benign Parent of the Human Race, in humble supplication that, since He has been pleased to favor the American people with opportunities for deliberating in perfect tranquility, and dispositions for deciding with unparalleled unanimity on a form of government for the security of their union and the advancement of their happiness, so His divine blessings may be equally conspicuous in the enlarged views, the temperate consultations and the wise measures on which the success of this Government must depend.

Why would I be posting George Washington's Inaugural address now?  I have news.  You know how Glen Beck unlocked so many mysteries about what is happening in our country and why.  I have received some news that is mind boggling:

Because the first collective act of our new nation immediately after George Washington was inaugurated was to gather together in prayer to dedicate our nation to God.  The place was St. Paul's Chapel in New York City.  Do you know where St. Paul's Chapel is?  It sits at the corner of  Ground Zero, where Muslim radicals attacked America.  Where God revealed that His "protective hedge" was removed due to America breaking covenant with God.
Our nation's leaders, the Senate Majority Leader, Tom Daschle, gave an address that announced the "joint resolution" of our government that proclaimed God's judgement on our nation on Sept/12, 2001:

This attack was the first of God's warnings to America.  Our nation has strayed so far from God, He has been calling out to us.  He wants us to return to Him.  Please buy the book, THE HARBINGER, to fully understand how the dots are connected.

You are welcomed to leave a comment.

You are also invited to visit Oma at and

Sunday, October 21, 2012


   Amanda, this post is for you, because I know you have health issues and sometimes it is all you can do just to get through the next hour.  I get that.  So, when you state that you are undecided about which way to vote in November, I had to step up and give you as much information as I can.  So, here goes:
   I have said since Romney obtained the Republican nomination that I am not voting for him.  I did not like anything he did to win...the lies and meanness of spirit.  That said, I have said I am voting against Obama.  Let him who have eyes see, let him who have ears hear. 
   I have seen what Obama's media has been doing to give him another term:  how they have altered the news to shine a better light on the man and make it look like he is the greatest thing ever.  I refer you back to the Treyvon Martin case for one.  ABC, CBS, they omitted information and altered information to make it seem that Treyvon was the victim after Obama got involved and said, "If I had a son, he would possibly be like Treyvon."  The facts showed that the kid was a thug and the Hispanic was the victim.
   Even recently, when Terrorists hit Benghazi and killed our people, Obama and his media made it look like America instigated that.  Obama had one of our citizens arrested for instigating the violence.  The fact, however, is that Obama was too busy campaigning to heed the requests for added security to the Embassy there, and the Ambassador had told them that he had been targeted.  Two weeks later, Obama finally says it was a terror attack.  Hello.  9/11.  Do you think the security should have been beefed up a little?
   He is a Muslim, by his own admission.  He attends a "church" for 20 years that preaches, "not God bless America, but God damn America".  This is Obama's philosophy.  He wants to bring America to her knees and is succeeding in it.  He wants to bring America down to a third world status.  He is an anti-colonialist.
   These are just a few of the things I know.  Oh, and don't forget the blog site where he is portrayed as the "second coming": .  There is so much information available about him, I can't imagine why anyone would vote for him.

Let me know your thoughts.

You are also invited to visit Oma at and

Tuesday, October 16, 2012



The following are some facebook posts on tonight's debate:

i guess obama is on crack tonight instead of weed

ooops it just may come to blows. i guess romney is tired of obama calling him a liar to his face.......crack!!!!!!!!!!!

well, romney finally called middle INCOME Americans instead of middle CLASS like obama says

i'd like to fart in that moderator's face

obama talks about everybody else's policies but can't discuss his own

obama wants to spend money we will save by not fighting wars but we are BORROWING that money for the wars. why can't he pay down the deficit instead?

obama just blamed everybody else why he did not keep his campaign promises

he sold them to drug cartels across the border

if Americans don't have opportunities in this country for an education, how did President Obama get one?
     Hmmm, maybe as a foreign exchange student
now, quote steve jobs
     that's sad that the moderator had to
     steve jobs said it was because of the regulations
     you are a crack up... Im reading each post LOL :)smile

the fact is that real Americans don't have any misperceptions

if you missed the debate tonight, all you missed was a circle jerk

   The following is what the Drudge Report observed:
At the second presidential debate on Tuesday night, a camera caught first lady Michelle Obama clapping after moderator Candy Crowley told Republican presidential candidate Gov. Mitt Romney that President Obama called the Benghazi attack an "act of terror" soon after the attack on the U.S. consulate.

Nearly all of the audible applause came from those sitting away from the actual debate, but when FOX News' camera shot moved to a bird's-eye view it became apparent that the only applause from the participating debate audience came from first lady Michelle Obama. Mitt Romney's wife Ann was also sitting with the debate participants.

According to the rules both campaigns agreed to, or the memorandum of understanding (MOA), there is to be no clapping from members of the debate audience.

The rule: Article 9, Section A, Subsection 7: "All members of the debate audience will be instructed by the moderator before the debate goes on the air and by the moderator after the debate goes on the air not to applaud, speak, or otherwise participate in the debate by any means other than by silent observation, except as provided by the agreed upon rules of the October 16 town hall debate."

   Paul Scicchitano at Newsmax reported Cindy Crowley's behavior this way:

Republican strategist Bradley A. Blakeman tells Newsmax that CNN’s Candy Crowley was “wrong” to correct GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney during Tuesday’s tempestuous presidential debate.

“Candy Crowley was wrong. The president used the term ‘terror’ generically, not specifically. And if the president is telling us today that he knew when he entered the rose garden that it was an act of terror, then why did he let his subordinates go out and spin the story that it was not?,” said Blakeman, a Newsmax contributor who appears regularly on Fox News.

Candy Crowley moderated the second presidential debate.
CNN's Candy Crowley overshadowed the candidates themselves at times.
(Getty Images)
Crowley’s now famous interjection in the second of three presidential debates overshadowed the candidates themselves to some extent, according to Blakeman.

“Candy Crowley became a participant in the event — kind of the teacher helping the student, especially the Libya response from the president,” he said.

Crowley interjected “He did in fact sir” in response to Romney’s assertion that the president blamed an anti-Muslim video the day after the Libyan attack rather than calling it an act of terrorism.

Blakeman, who was a senior member in the last Bush administration, insisted that Romney was correct in calling the president out for misleading the American people.

“The president — if you go back and listen to his remarks — he used the remarks ‘terror’ generically and not specifically to what happened in Benghazi. And even on Univision, he said ‘we’re still investigating,’” said Blakeman. “Well if we’re still investigating, then it wasn’t an act of terror Mr. President, was it?”

   That is what happens when the liberal media inject themselves as part of the Obama Administration.  That is why it looked like a circle jerk:  it was two against one: President Obama and Candy Crowley against Mit Romney.
What are your thoughts?

You are also invited to follow Oma at and

Thursday, October 11, 2012



   Did you see the Vice Presidential debate tonight?  Did you invest the time to watch it yourself or are you waiting on the Obama media to tell you what they hoped it was?
   I watched it.  I watched the President last week.  But Joe Biden's performance was reflective of the Obama Administration and all the Lib's who are up for re-election this year.  He was rude and loud.  His behavior was to make faces and noises and interrupt Paul Ryan.  Biden never accepted responsibility for the mess our country is in stateside or worldwide. 
   Biden had no plausible response to any of the questions, so he tried to put words in Romney's mouth.  When that didn't provoke the response he wanted, he just got louder and louder.  It was truly a pathetic performance and reflects the desperation of the Administration.  At one point, he even had the audacity to blame Romney for the massacre in Benghazi.
   About the Benghazi incident, Vice-President Joe Biden said The Administration's Intelligence did not call the attack a "terrorist attack" for two weeks!  He said their Intelligence was puzzled.  He said the Administration did not know there was or would be a threat there!  What that  translates to mean is that President Obama has surrounded himself with the stupidest people he could find.  Anyone with eyes could see that was a terrorist attack....on 9/11.  That is the fundamental problem with this Administration and with the Progressives as a whole...They can't see what is in front of them.
   My grade for this debate:  pathetic for Biden; respectful for Ryan.

What are your thoughts?

You are also invited to follow Oma at and

Thursday, October 4, 2012


   The following are some posts from facebook after last night's Presidential debate:

Obama's camp said that this is what our President said today:
"I was going to prepare for the debate, but I got high"

The following is from the "pundits" today:
Obama is blaming Bush for his performance last night
Romney was Eastwooding

Where is Winston when you need him?

You are also invited to visit Oma at and (where we cling to our religion).